COINCIDENCES FROM THE BABBLE

By: Bryan Boodhoo

In one of our Sunday meetings Glenn Wheaton suggested a working group project. The basics, the working group would conduct their weekly target as normal. One viewer would be designated, told not to work the target. Everything is turned in as normal on the part of the other viewers. The designated viewer will do something else. Members of the guild have targeteered many targets over the years. They have a massive repository. The designated viewer would randomly choose one of these targets from this repository. They would turn in a session from that archive in lieu of their own work. The observer is looking for any correlation between the random target that is chosen and the target of the week that was conducted by the other working group members. In other words. We’re looking to correlate data from another target from years ago with work that was produced in our present working group.

If there is a correlation between the two, it would suggest a deviation from randomness. It would suggest that randomness and chaos can be influenced by an experimenter that carries the intent. All that is required is to have and know in your mind is the design. The effect may present itself. If it doesn’t for that experiment. It may require subsequent experiments.

If successful it would mean that the data that was produced years ago is significant in its own rite. It can mean that our targets in our present would’ve had a connection that may have been felt at the time of the old target being targeteered. It can mean that information can go both ways. Judging from personal experiences and work that has been produced within our groups suggest that this may be the case.

Considering recent events that have manifested. Information from the future had a signature that has been felt by many of our group and professional remote viewers. Its signature has been felt by me for a few weeks though it lacked precision. It did have a feeling of being significant, enough to be recognizable to myself and others.

Events from the future that carry a massive signature will likely have a palpable effect psychically. This information makes attempts to make itself known in our known environment. It starts presenting itself in Remote viewing sessions. It is present in the language used by people, Bible verses, old scripts, unintentional Freudian slips, dreams. It’s sort of an unconscious mask. It’s hard to get a grip on a nebulous event that tell the whole story with precision. The psychic mind has decided to break this up by making the information appear in pieces. Smaller events that comes into your awareness become significant when they manifest in an out of the ordinary way. After the event has occurred, If you’ve observed those unlikely situations you would have pieced most of the puzzle together. The unlikely occurrences that presented themselves to you at the time is significant. It is reinforced after the event when a highly psychic person realizes the information to be significant. That reinforcement is feedback for the subconscious mind. As a remote viewer, our interpretation and realization of psychic information is very subtle. The goal of feedback is to reinforce our subtitles. It is only natural that Information from the future is omnipresent to members within our environment. There is an attempt to communicate back in time that is retroactively apparent once observed.

Evolutionarily, to a certain extent. This is the sixth sense that may have saved us from a life-or-death situation. There is a use for it. Its is subtle in the randomness of life but becomes increasingly more reliable when the environment presents a foreseeable challenge. The things that have happened in the past few months support this claim.

On 10/2/23 Glenn Wheaton sent me a suggested target for the working group. This is not a normal occurrence, a sign of something significant. I targeteered it on 10/03/2023 and sent it to Lori on 10/3/2023. It was published by her on the same day. If a randomly chosen target can be representative of a target in the future, It is certainly possible that an event in the future can be represented by a randomly chosen target in the present. This becomes even more significant when it goes under observation and analyzed.

The title of the article that was sent to me: The Battle of Palmdale: That Time the Air Force Accidentally Bombed Southern California. I’ve read and understood the target. It describes an event in which the navy sent an unmanned drone over the ocean of southern California. They were conducting an exercise in which the drone would be shot down with an air-to-air missile. The unmanned drone went rouge and was unable to be controlled. The navy called in the Airforce to shoot it down as it could crash into Los Angelos. The Airforce answered the call and had the planes try to intercept the unmanned drone. The Airforce’s aircraft was equipped with two pods of 52 unguided Mighty Mouse 2.75-inch rockets. There were 104 on a plane, the Airforce sent 2 planes that collectively had 208 rockets. The airplane automatic firing control systems failed. The two pilots had to fire manually. Instead of hitting the target, the rockets all fell across Southern California, leaving a 150- acre brush fire near Bouquet Canyon, a 350-acre fire in Soledad Canyon and 100 acres near Placerita Canyon. All 208 rockets missed the drone. Nobody died. Downtown Palmdale was bombed with rockets. The drone eventually crashed after running out of fuel.

Looking at this event, the day it was sent, processed, and executed, it becomes significant in light of recent events. On October 7th, the conflict is Israel started, an estimated 2,200 plus missiles were in the air originating from Gaza and landing in central and southern Israel. I’m not a news guy, ill tell what is being reported. What Id like to bring under observation are the similarities between the target that has been published in working group and a world event that has manifested.

I am left with these questions:

• Do remote viewers entrain themselves with the feedback process post session?

• Does experienced remote viewers have a natural entrainment in which they can perceive significance from the future and it is reinforced by feedback?       

• Do remote viewers have a natural entrainment similar to the one above because of this feedback process and attention given to it?

• Does something have an increase in significance and ability to manifest if many people were to bring it under observation?

• Does psychic/ remote viewing observation increase the chances of an event occurring?

• It is rare that someone thinks of an event for two hours at a time. We do this in Remote viewing, we break down an event in small bits and it is under constant observation for about 2 hours. Does that leave in imprint in consciousness, creating a 100th monkey effect? Does it also increase the likelihood of a future event happening?

• We can see information from the future and past is available to us through subtle impressions, what can we do with that?